The Government & Aviation

Press aticles

A parliamentary inquiry into lobbying, launched on 21st June 2007, considered external regulation, government interaction and funding by lobby groups. Details of BAA's lobbying groups and its close links to government formed part of this inquiry.

Written evidence submitted shows that a level playing field does not exist when it comes to BAA and BA securing meetings with the Secretary of State or the Under-Secretary of State for Transport.

The public administration select committee report said: "There has been widespread public concern that some areas of government policy have effectively been captured at an early stage by interest groups, usually within industry, and that public consultations have been unbalanced in the favour of these interests." It named Heathrow as an example of this and
concluded that lobbying needed to be open to public scrutiny.

A separate investigation also revealed that BAA and the government “fixed” environmental targets while researching the impact of the third runway.

Some articles on these and similar subjects are referenced here.

Early Day Motions

On 17th December, 2008, an Early Day Motion (EDM) demanding a vote on the third runway in the Commons was submitted. Gordon Brown has refused a vote.

To see which MPs have signed this EDM, please click on the title below.

"ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THIRD RUNWAY AT HEATHROW"


On 27th October, 2008, an EDM opposing the government's policy on the third runway was submitted for debate in the Commons. Although few EDMs make it to the floor of the House, a debate was held on 11th November, 2008, with the number of MPs speaking out against Heathrow expansion vastly outnumbering those in favour.

To see which MPs signed this EDM, please click the title below.

"GOVERNMENT POLICY ON THIRD RUNWAY AT HEATHROW AIRPORT"

Runway file kept secret by Geoff Hoon PDF Print E-mail
Sunday, 22 March 2009 01:00

Geoff Hoon, the transport secretary, has been accused of suppressing his own officials’ reports, which could have defeated government plans for a third runway at Heathrow. After a seven-month battle, the information commissioner last week ordered Hoon’s department to release to Greenpeace a register of hazards to the project, which it had insisted on keeping secret.

It shows his department’s internal worries about risks ranging from increased air pollution to the strength of opposition to the runway and the likelihood of a judicial review succeeding. The register recorded how likely it was that each risk could derail the project. Jim Fitzpatrick, the aviation minister in Hoon’s department, had claimed the register was closed in 2007, but it has now emerged that entries were made more than a year later.

Justine Greening, the shadow London minister to whom Fitzpatrick made his statement in January, said: “What they told me was not true, and is a particularly extreme example of a deliberately inaccurate [parliamentary] answer apparently designed to mislead an MP.” She added: “The documents show the Heathrow consultation was not about facts, it was about how best to spin them.”

Read the full article in
The Sunday Times.


It will all come out. The lies, the spin and the reasons behind the ill-conceived decision to press ahead with Heathrow expansion.

And the parts played by Hoon, Fitzpatrick and Brown.

 
RocketTheme Joomla Templates