The Government & Aviation

Press aticles

A parliamentary inquiry into lobbying, launched on 21st June 2007, considered external regulation, government interaction and funding by lobby groups. Details of BAA's lobbying groups and its close links to government formed part of this inquiry.

Written evidence submitted shows that a level playing field does not exist when it comes to BAA and BA securing meetings with the Secretary of State or the Under-Secretary of State for Transport.

The public administration select committee report said: "There has been widespread public concern that some areas of government policy have effectively been captured at an early stage by interest groups, usually within industry, and that public consultations have been unbalanced in the favour of these interests." It named Heathrow as an example of this and
concluded that lobbying needed to be open to public scrutiny.

A separate investigation also revealed that BAA and the government “fixed” environmental targets while researching the impact of the third runway.

Some articles on these and similar subjects are referenced here.

Early Day Motions

On 17th December, 2008, an Early Day Motion (EDM) demanding a vote on the third runway in the Commons was submitted. Gordon Brown has refused a vote.

To see which MPs have signed this EDM, please click on the title below.

"ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THIRD RUNWAY AT HEATHROW"


On 27th October, 2008, an EDM opposing the government's policy on the third runway was submitted for debate in the Commons. Although few EDMs make it to the floor of the House, a debate was held on 11th November, 2008, with the number of MPs speaking out against Heathrow expansion vastly outnumbering those in favour.

To see which MPs signed this EDM, please click the title below.

"GOVERNMENT POLICY ON THIRD RUNWAY AT HEATHROW AIRPORT"

Nice little earner for three-homes Geoff Hoon PDF Print E-mail
Sunday, 05 April 2009 01:00

Geoff Hoon, the transport secretary, claimed expenses on his constituency home while renting out his London house and living rent-free in a luxury grace-and-favour home.

Hoon, who as defence minister led Britain’s war in Iraq, lived out the conflict in Admiralty House, a government building. At the same time he rented out his London property. The rent he received has not been disclosed, but the terraced house had a rental value estimated at £18,000 a year. Hoon also claimed more than £70,000 on a third property, his constituency home in Derbyshire, during the six years he was defence secretary.

The transport secretary told The Mail on Sunday: “I only claimed whatever the rules allowed for. The [Commons] fees office was aware what was happening. Indeed, I was told to move into Admiralty House on security advice. I was told unless I went into secure premises I would have to have round-the-clock police protection at my home in London and that would cost the taxpayer a great deal more.”

Hoon and his wife, Elaine, have built up a property portfolio worth £1.7m, including a property in the Suffolk seaside town of Walberswick and a Westminster house bought for £635,000 in 2006.

Read the full article in
The Sunday Times.


This is the man who, despite overwhelming evidence against Heathrow expansion, decided to go ahead with the third runway. We could put that down to an error of judgement.

This is the man who, by moving into a grace and favour apartment, renting out his London home and claiming for a third property in Derbyshire, "only claimed whatever the rules allowed for". We could put that down to a desire to bury his snout deeper into the trough.

But this is also the man who believes it is OK to condemn an entire village to oblivion while building up his own little property portfolio at the taxpayers' expense, and saying it's a tough decision. That's just immoral.

Hoon's ability to choose the wrong option almost every time would be laughable if it didn't negatively affect the lives of so many people.

 
RocketTheme Joomla Templates