The Government & Aviation

Press aticles

A parliamentary inquiry into lobbying, launched on 21st June 2007, considered external regulation, government interaction and funding by lobby groups. Details of BAA's lobbying groups and its close links to government formed part of this inquiry.

Written evidence submitted shows that a level playing field does not exist when it comes to BAA and BA securing meetings with the Secretary of State or the Under-Secretary of State for Transport.

The public administration select committee report said: "There has been widespread public concern that some areas of government policy have effectively been captured at an early stage by interest groups, usually within industry, and that public consultations have been unbalanced in the favour of these interests." It named Heathrow as an example of this and
concluded that lobbying needed to be open to public scrutiny.

A separate investigation also revealed that BAA and the government “fixed” environmental targets while researching the impact of the third runway.

Some articles on these and similar subjects are referenced here.

Early Day Motions

On 17th December, 2008, an Early Day Motion (EDM) demanding a vote on the third runway in the Commons was submitted. Gordon Brown has refused a vote.

To see which MPs have signed this EDM, please click on the title below.

"ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THIRD RUNWAY AT HEATHROW"


On 27th October, 2008, an EDM opposing the government's policy on the third runway was submitted for debate in the Commons. Although few EDMs make it to the floor of the House, a debate was held on 11th November, 2008, with the number of MPs speaking out against Heathrow expansion vastly outnumbering those in favour.

To see which MPs signed this EDM, please click the title below.

"GOVERNMENT POLICY ON THIRD RUNWAY AT HEATHROW AIRPORT"

Heathrow expansion makes no sense, says Brown's green czar PDF Print E-mail
Tuesday, 21 April 2009 01:00

Gordon Brown's green guru today savaged the Government's decision to back a third runway at Heathrow. Lord Stern, who compiled a landmark report on global warming for Mr Brown, warned that supporting a bigger Heathrow undermined confidence in Britain's ability to meet its climate change target.

He also accused Transport Secretary Geoff Hoon of jumping the gun in announcing government approval in January for another runway at the airport.

"Big transport decisions, such as the third runway at Heathrow, should be taken only if they make sense in the context of a coherent carbon and transport policy for the UK, and preferably, for Europe as a whole," he said. "I would be surprised if construction of a third runway at Heathrow passed that test, which will be applied by the Committee on Climate Change by the end of this year. The runway decision should not have been taken before the committee's examination."

Ministers have been accused of colluding with airport operator BAA over the expansion plans and of ignoring local opposition.

Read the full article in
The Evening Standard.


Lord Stern shouldn't really be surprised if construction of a third runway at Heathrow somehow passed "the test".

The government, the DFT and BAA have manipulated the figures to suit their agenda. Why shouldn't they do the same again?

 
RocketTheme Joomla Templates