The Government & Aviation

Press aticles

A parliamentary inquiry into lobbying, launched on 21st June 2007, considered external regulation, government interaction and funding by lobby groups. Details of BAA's lobbying groups and its close links to government formed part of this inquiry.

Written evidence submitted shows that a level playing field does not exist when it comes to BAA and BA securing meetings with the Secretary of State or the Under-Secretary of State for Transport.

The public administration select committee report said: "There has been widespread public concern that some areas of government policy have effectively been captured at an early stage by interest groups, usually within industry, and that public consultations have been unbalanced in the favour of these interests." It named Heathrow as an example of this and
concluded that lobbying needed to be open to public scrutiny.

A separate investigation also revealed that BAA and the government “fixed” environmental targets while researching the impact of the third runway.

Some articles on these and similar subjects are referenced here.

Early Day Motions

On 17th December, 2008, an Early Day Motion (EDM) demanding a vote on the third runway in the Commons was submitted. Gordon Brown has refused a vote.

To see which MPs have signed this EDM, please click on the title below.

"ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THIRD RUNWAY AT HEATHROW"


On 27th October, 2008, an EDM opposing the government's policy on the third runway was submitted for debate in the Commons. Although few EDMs make it to the floor of the House, a debate was held on 11th November, 2008, with the number of MPs speaking out against Heathrow expansion vastly outnumbering those in favour.

To see which MPs signed this EDM, please click the title below.

"GOVERNMENT POLICY ON THIRD RUNWAY AT HEATHROW AIRPORT"

State 'spying on Heathrow critics' as dossiers compiled of legitimate objectors to third runway are handed to police PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 25 May 2009 00:00

Civil servants are compiling dossiers on opponents of Heathrow Airport expansion and handing them over to police, it emerged yesterday. Communications staff at the Department for Transport are gathering data on legitimate objectors to the £9billion third runway and offering the information to Scotland Yard.

Last night, Liberal Democrat transport spokesman Norman Baker warned that the activities of the DfT's supposedly non-partisan civil servants were another step towards a 'Stasi-like police state'. DfT officials monitored anyone speaking out against the planned third runway during the run-up to January's narrow Commons approval of the scheme. Potentially the names of tens of thousands of innocent people from websites, press releases, news articles and public consultations were trawled over by bureaucrats, who then briefed detectives.

Critics suggest that even those who write letters to the DfT expressing concerns about the third runway will be checked out and the police notified.

The existence of the 'communications directorate' charged with monitoring opposition to a third runway was revealed in a written Parliamentary answer from Transport Secretary Geoff Hoon. Mr Hoon said his officials sought to 'understand the views' of those 'with an interest in transport policy'.  But he admitted that information was being passed to police in the run-up to protests to ensure public safety.

He said: 'It is entirely appropriate that the department discussed safety arrangements with the relevant police forces.'

Read the full article in
The Daily Mail.


Sorry Buff, it's entirely inappropriate for the DfT to behave in this way.

What would appropriate however, would be a police investigation into how a
£1.7 million property empire was built with taxpayers money, and why the DfT repeatedly met with BAA prior to the decision in January when a blanket ban was supposed to be in operation.

In case the police aren't clear where to start, the names Geoff Hoon and David Gray have already been mentioned in Parliament.

 
RocketTheme Joomla Templates