The Government & Aviation

Press aticles

A parliamentary inquiry into lobbying, launched on 21st June 2007, considered external regulation, government interaction and funding by lobby groups. Details of BAA's lobbying groups and its close links to government formed part of this inquiry.

Written evidence submitted shows that a level playing field does not exist when it comes to BAA and BA securing meetings with the Secretary of State or the Under-Secretary of State for Transport.

The public administration select committee report said: "There has been widespread public concern that some areas of government policy have effectively been captured at an early stage by interest groups, usually within industry, and that public consultations have been unbalanced in the favour of these interests." It named Heathrow as an example of this and
concluded that lobbying needed to be open to public scrutiny.

A separate investigation also revealed that BAA and the government “fixed” environmental targets while researching the impact of the third runway.

Some articles on these and similar subjects are referenced here.

Early Day Motions

On 17th December, 2008, an Early Day Motion (EDM) demanding a vote on the third runway in the Commons was submitted. Gordon Brown has refused a vote.

To see which MPs have signed this EDM, please click on the title below.

"ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THIRD RUNWAY AT HEATHROW"


On 27th October, 2008, an EDM opposing the government's policy on the third runway was submitted for debate in the Commons. Although few EDMs make it to the floor of the House, a debate was held on 11th November, 2008, with the number of MPs speaking out against Heathrow expansion vastly outnumbering those in favour.

To see which MPs signed this EDM, please click the title below.

"GOVERNMENT POLICY ON THIRD RUNWAY AT HEATHROW AIRPORT"

Tory at odds with Cameron over Heathrow third runway PDF Print E-mail
Thursday, 23 July 2009 00:00

A Tory frontbencher who said his party would "revisit" its opposition to a third Heathrow runway after the election was sharply contradicted today.

David Cameron has made scrapping the plan a key part of his transport policy, warning firms not to invest in the project. But Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, a Tory international trade and development spokesman, said he was "fully aware of the potential damage this might do to Britain's international air travel". In a letter to a constituent he added he expected the issue would be "revisited" after the next general election.

The MP for Cotswold was, however, swiftly required by Conservative Campaign Headquarters to issue a statement insisting that he "did not intend" to suggest Mr Cameron would ditch the policy if elected. "The party line is that there will be no third runway at Heathrow," he said. "What I believe is irrelevant. I am a member of David Cameron's front bench and that is his policy."

Theresa Villiers, Shadow Transport Secretary, said: "Our position is clear and will not change. Under a Conservative government there will be no third runway at Heathrow."

Susan Kramer, Liberal Democrat MP for Richmond Park, Heathrow expansion, said: "It would be a disgrace if the Conservatives went back on their pledge to scrap proposals for a third runway at Heathrow. This would be a betrayal of every statement made to residents living under the flight path and those who care about the environment and climate change."

Read the full article in
The Times.


Quite. As a start, Cameron must make it a manifesto commitment not to expand Heathrow.

 
RocketTheme Joomla Templates